PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH CATARACT SURGERY AND POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL IBADAN AND ST MARY’S CATHOLIC EYE HOSPITAL AGO-IWOYE, NIGERIA
This is an observational descriptive study with an analytical
component. Consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery and posterior
chamber intraocular lens implantation at the University College Hospital
Ibadan and St Mary’s Catholic Eye Hospital Ago Iwoye, Nigeria were
studied between May and October 2007.
The study aimed at describing the satisfaction of patients with
cataract surgical services and the impact of cataract surgery with posterior
chamber intraocular lens implantation, in terms of visual function and
vision- related quality of life among patients 40 years old and above in the
two hospitals. The study also aims at highlighting the differences between
the two centres with the purpose of bringing out the lessons that can be
learnt from both centres.
A total of 366 patients who presented to the two hospitals and met
the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. A structured
questionnaire was administered in the preoperative period from which the
following information was obtained: demographic data, patient satisfaction
with the preoperative services, and preoperative assessment of visual
function using the Visual Function -14 tool. The second phase of data
collection was in the immediate postoperative period to assess patient
satisfaction with vision 1st day post surgery. The third phase of data
collection was at 8 weeks postoperatively to assess patient satisfaction with
postoperative care, subjective and objective visual outcome. Differences between the 2 hospitals were highlighted. Results were analyzed using the
Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Significant association was taken at
95% confidence interval i.e. < 0.05.
There was no statistically significant difference in the demographic
characteristics of the patients studied in the 2 hospitals. Two hundred and
sixty eight patients (73.2%) were blind in the operated eye preoperatively
while 91 patients (24.9%) were blind in both eyes at presentation. Mean
patient satisfaction with preoperative care was better at St Mary’s Catholic
Hospital (3.01 ± 0.65) than at the University College Hospital (2.89 ± 0.65)
out of a total score of 4 points. However this difference was not
statistically significant. Best corrected visual acuity after refraction at 8
weeks showed that 258 patients (81.1%) had good vision (6/6-6/18) in both
hospitals while 42 patients (13.2%) had borderline vision (<6/18-6/60), and
18 patients (5.7%) had severe visual impairment (<6/60) out of 318
patients refracted. Forty-eight did not come for their postoperative
refraction. Glaucoma was the commonest ocular co-morbidity accounting
for 9.3% of patients 8 weeks after cataract surgery followed by age related
maculopathy which accounted for 3.5% of patients.
Prior to surgery, 105 patients (31.3%) had visual function score of
75% and above, however at 8 weeks after surgery, 306 patients (91.3%)
had a visual function score of over 75%. Vision-related quality of life
improved in 219 patients (65.4%). There was no statistically significant
difference in the vision related quality of life of patients studied in the two
hospitals (p = 0.48). Visual acuity at 8 weeks post surgery, ocular comorbidity, visual function assessment-14 scores and postoperative vision
related quality of life were predictors of overall satisfaction with vision.
Predictors of overall satisfaction with care were courtesy of health staff,
pre-consultation waiting time and fulfilment of patient expectations.
Patients who had cataract surgery at both hospitals showed that cataract surgery is an effective treatment in terms of improvement in visual acuity,
postoperative visual function and patient’s opinion of quality of life.
Further studies to address the long term satisfaction of patients with
respect to visual function and quality of life after cataract surgery in our
community is still necessary.